Back to all articles

Would you make different decisions if you could see the future?

| Retirement Outcomes

Sanlam Employee Benefits recently released a new retirement calculator for corporate clients to assist new employees in selecting their retirement fund deductions.  The calculator presented an interesting concept: if, when making a decision about the amount of money to deduct off your salary for retirement, you were shown immediately the income it would provide you in retirement, would it affect how much of your salary you would contribute to retirement?

The experience for most people starting at a new company is receiving a wad of papers to sign which will determine their medical scheme and retirement fund deductions. Companies usually provide a choice around what percentage of  members’ salaries they want to contribute towards retirement. The problem is that employees have no idea what the numbers actually mean in terms of their future retirement benefits. Because of this, most employees will select the lowest possible contribution in order to maximise their take-home pay.

According to Mayuri Reddy, Market Strategist at Sanlam Employee Benefits, the rule of thumb is that you need to aim for 75% of your final salary on retirement. This assumes that by the time you retire you no longer have to provide for mortgage payments, school fees or retirement savings, so you need less to live on each month.

When using the calculator, a young 25-year-old starting their first job would find that if they contributed 15% of their salary each month to their retirement fund they would be able to retire with 75% of their income at the age of 65. If, however, they saved 20% of their salary they could retire by the age of 60. If they only saved 11% of their salary, they would have less than 60% of their final salary in retirement.

Would this information be incentive enough to make sure they selected at least 15% to meet their minimum retirement income objectives, or even 20% to allow them to retire earlier?

And what about the late savers?  For example, what if a person at the age of 35 changes jobs for a bigger salary and cashes in their retirement fund? The calculation would tell them that now, in order to retire at the age of 65 with an income equal to 75% of their salary, they have to contribute 23% of their salary to their retirement fund. Would this be sufficient motivation to use a portion of the pay rise to boost their retirement savings?

Or what if, upon leaving their first job, they received a calculation showing them that if they cashed in their retirement fund they would have to increase their contributions from 15% to 23% in order to retire with sufficient income. Would the person have rather preserved their funds?

Currently the average retirement contribution is around 11%. Sanlam has enough data to track behavioural changes once the calculator is introduced, so it is going to make an interesting study in human behaviour.

The ultimate question is: do we make better decisions for our future if we have the correct information at the time, or will our immediate needs prevail?

 

Sanlam Life Assurance Company (Ltd) is a licensed financial services provider.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Show Comments

Comments are closed.